Alejandro Suárez Sánchez-Ocaña. TIME-sector employer since 1998, the Group CEO and Publispain Network blogs Entertainment Networks SL President Inversora Foley, Director and Founding Partner of Yes.fm, consultant and investor in several companies for innovation, new technologies and the Internet.
Sorry to leave, because obviously I am not anybody to choose the best post of the year, but if I feel like in my first as a blogger in December, after 10 to choose the Internet / technology / seo / publicity that I have drawn attention I have to think I hope that you like
(organized without any predetermined order, as I have come to mind and I think most of them are timeless and can be read at any time).
Of course there will be many post that could be on this list and did not know or have forgotten
If you share in the comments that would be perfect for you add all! (thanks!)
I have always had certain things to play panic websites when operating in a stable.
Over the past 45 days we have had a "fun" time of tension when playing a scheduling portal online flash games that we had since 2004. This site receives about 25.000-30.000 unique visits a day since 2006 in a stable. Ie figure ever lower those numbers and prints 6,000,000 page views per month.
The stability of the site and traffic can be seen in this graph Analitycs of the first 10 months of the year
In the graph you can see the stability of the site, which cyclically repeated serrated teeth of the weekend, except the summer months that the concept weekend away in the entertainment sites.
If the story today because I believe that figure is to see two things, because the former often operating services, better not to experiment too much with them, and because Google sends a radical.
It will be like in 1 month and a half of these "bright ideas" that sometimes I have decided to update the site a little more towards a 2.0, and with Jorge, our programmer, James, our Chief Technical and Diego Entertainment coordinator, I coñazo on a couple of days to make some changes.
In 10 days we have refined the code and changed the concept, without changing the structure or urls indexed site we have built into an old CMS a blog you are launched based on WordPress news are not published in WordPress, but painted in CMS in the old home, giving a greater sense of updating the website.
It is pretty, I feel flex and we are left with a feeling of having to wash his face web SEO have made some changes to help us wants to work his way up a little rank, and details of old have improved usability, so quiet ...
It seems that Google did not take the change as well, in 1 week and sent us to the abyss of unexplainable for me and my team. Literally eliminated 90% of the site and left the index only the new URLs. As much as we review the site did not find the reason and swear in these 45 days have devoted many hours to think we had done wrong without finding it. The result? A fall of 90% of URLs indexed in Google, and a fall of 90% of site traffic. The same figure until a few days earlier afraid:
The collapse in numbers of unique users 25.000-30.000 andalusia 3.500-3.800 day to day. A domain is going to print 6,000,000 page views per month to about 450,000 a month overnight. The worst is still not know exactly why and face fool you are left.
After a long turn, our program concludes that a conflict could be generated from WordPress CMS and the old who, although not visible to the user and test for our spiders and not find anything like that described, or have usability problem could be affecting the search engine, which decided to eliminate 6000 index urls indexed well and good positions in less than 7 days, leaving a token 230.
Conclusion on Monday Jorge made some changes, particularly in the htacess and our relationship with WordPress CMS, James and I do not have the slightest confidence that we resolve the issue in that way because we still do not see the problem ... but voilá ... Google starts eating again urls (for 1800 is indexed and there is still a lot) and traffic begins to rebound gradually. I hope that we leave in a month where we were ... We have already started climbing up towards the back.
And many times, things that work, the "seen but not touch" is totally fustifica, and we must be careful with things that are foolish not to take risks.
Bernardo is pretty cool and has already warned that its serial number for all the equipment so it does not "miss"
(sorry for the photos, the iPhone is almost no light)
On August 19, certainly on plan and as a casual coif, I commented in the office and then in a game blog called Alexander experiment. It was at 3 months (ie before November 19) to achieve the shift from not only many thousand pages to the top of Google, the search for "Alexander" with 50,000,000 results.
Frankly I have not spent much time until yesterday, several good friends at a dinner in Madrid, it was the very gulfs have bet money on this topic, some in favor and others against and it was very quiet, I recalled the item (the truth, it hardly remember), noting that missing a few days ... and I looked at the dates and it is true, in its day it had no comment and watched results.
There are a few days time and look at Google's index am .... Now in this second datacenter.
We'll see if enough time to position it in 7-8 days as the first in Google, it will be very difficult and it is possible to achieve longer-term and then I made some business cards as Javier Casares, that when I saw I did thank you very much, they say something like "To contact Alejandro search on Google"
Is really difficult because I have been very first bundled to spend time, then it is my domain one. Is and has little time (4-5 months) online, it's difficult position as the first of the 50 million searches and finally because and "Alexander" at least 3 highly relevant searches, the first Alexander the Great in Wikipedia that it is difficult to unseat, the second by the official website of one Alejandro Sanz, and the fourth by another popular artist in Mexico, Alejandro Fernandez ... Overall, the outcome next week, but already the latter. try this week to see if we give it a push.
This unknown, that may not know as Alexander the Great could have so many references, I believe that cheating I will make the final sprint. It complicadillo but admitted betting!
Google does not stop, do not give these guys walking in their bid to all sectors where fagocitar smell money on the internet.
What I do not think it is ethical to eat what they prepare to search the Internet. They are trying to use its dominant position in Spain! Outrageously dominant! referring traffic to go to their own products by Article 33. (I decide what is most important, the most relevant and it's me!)
The latter is preparing with the music industry ... Google Music, but in future will, however, if, however, and possibly within 10 years if you sell mixers also going to spend Canuto, because insurance coparan 5 First results of the search for videos on youtube mixers, information about how Knole in a blender, and its new division Mixers Google, who happened to come first and a nice icon in front of a blender if the user is so useless that is tempting to click on another result of the index and enter all the content and / or value added is created by Google Inc. and mixers have come together to fagocitan as every search term mixers, vendértelas a fee. Gorgeous.
Prepare something with music, go slow but steady copando and colonizing markets. Music is the next big market for at least settle in my mind that it agrees with them.
Here is some of what catches the case, how Google is going to be the first position with a prominent icon in search of artists and music discs, a traffic of about hundreds of thousands of daily searches in Spanish.
What do you like us cast a music-related product?. Chico, bad luck. Only now to know what day it will definitely start, but it looks like:
Looking for Van Gogh's ear:
The first result is a page of the Google also highlighted with an icon, like a subliminal message that seems to say in his ear: "click on this, asshole." Then Wikipedia, the official website of the group, and videos from YouTube. Not bad, eat 3 of 5, soon to be in Spanish Knole 4 5 throwing down a bit to Wikipedia, the official website of the artist will leave by bullfighter icon without shame and without stress ... total, the click will be residual.
Well, we obey and click on the first. His position and that beautiful blue have convinced us:
Oh surprise, it opens an html inside Google that displays links to a selected group of discs, go, but how this was not a search engine?
You're lost, you're totally channeled into Google without choice (of course these pages Adwords added to avoid a rebound effect at this point will not be without you go box).
If you feel like one more click (¡masoca be!)
Verás que puedes ver la letra de la canción (donde lo ordena Google, claro) o bien comprar la canción.
4 useless clicks to "eat" all searches music themselves.
Where are the generators of quality content in all this, "Where the relevance? We do not want to organize the world's information, only comérnosla right?
Have the search with 92% share in a country and lead to artificially searches yourself, is it not a monopoly? Welcome to sit besides, what else can we do the rest in all this?
Ah! Molan but a lot and have slides in their offices ...
Google says: Dont be evil, Google! Man I fuck up ...!
This morning, a good friend asked me about my opinion on the browser of these poor kids entrepreneurs of God, which almost seem an NGO, and was surprised that it had not published anything in my blog.
Frankly I have no interest in commenting on this thing, that is the problem of Google Inc. and its press department, your browser may like me, not that anything or not, so what?, But what surprises me every time Moreover, and just as intimidating to me, is the power of Google as a header, as a mark to decide the agenda and organization on the Internet at all times, put on the table what is spoken, how they talk and all this with minimal investment communication and advertising. They are the masters.
For me it is not surprising that Google launched a browser now, I have always thought that eventually throwing up toasters. I know you think so, I must be a "lost" but I am tired and my policy launch of things to come to save our lives (but these guys, do you not end up exhausted?). Have never launched a product with commercial vocation, namely to make money or obtain information and / or other business benefits, these guys are an NGO working for us, just try to revolutionize and improve the world and try to index human knowledge: they are cool (background music of violins, please).
I enjoy seeing the word "chrome" has been on everyone's lips at the time they have decided to insist, with a press release, without the need for a global campaign or anything like that (see chart developments technorati) .
The campaigns for their products will make Google's free-of course-all media worldwide. A bargain, an evidence of the brand power and ability to intimidate a header with each movement acompleja your competition.
However, I believe that at least could have registered the domain, if only by not repeating the ridiculous and have learned what happened to www.adsense.com in its domain that day is not recorded (for what? Or they were to launch a service called AdSense, which would work ...) and had to buy years after launching the product to an intermediary, after a small company AdSense Consulting Inc, which now uses www.adsense2.com sold it after having recorded since 1996. The case was sounded fun, since this company literally sank excess traffic and operating costs since it launched Google Adsense. Apparently through whois received over 100 phone calls a day related to the domain. First thought .... ¡Adsense register in order to exploit this traffic! And what paradoxes? the life of Google did not approve your account. and then decided in 2004 to offer the domain to Google by email, and Google was not interested in buying whatever the price? Finally sold to a broker in 2005 and the domain was a fun show for years and shameful message "If you think you can get rich quick placing other people's ads on your site or blog, please contact Google who has taken and used our business name without permission or compensation ". Total, today is about the domain such as Google Inc. bought in November 2006, more than 4 years after launching the service of contextual advertising.
Here could almost pass as almost the same thing: Chrome.com is owned by a company in Portland (USA) dedicated to the automobile is still hallucinating seeing its traffic has soared in the most dumb as can be seen in this graph Alexa. Now might be thinking of selling the domain name. Only parking advertising possibly get much business they had so far.
The most terrible story of all the power is accumulated in a company to put on the agenda of millions of its products, just posting a press release. The expectation of generating power on any commercial launch like this and to convey the perception that it is not a product, but is the product and the ability to convey the perception that they do not, do for you (again violins).
I really launch this or that I seem more or less important, nor what they think is relevant to their products to anyone, I know, but what strikes me is that is literally a private company to monopolize the Internet. Indeed what they have launched these days, is a satellite into an American military spacecraft.
For at least 3-4 years what works and does not buy Google (ie YouTube) or try to copy this market fagocitar (Wikipedia, Firefox) and see who comes next. It is at least a dominant concern. Personally I liked most was when a search engine and little else.
Of course some of their products are wonderful and have marked a turning point; Google.com itself, Google Maps, Gmail, or are beautiful and useful products.
But I can not remove from my memory trials anti monopoly in the U.S. and Europe against Microsoft for trying to use its dominant position in the market for operating systems to enter the rest of their products to crushing competition. Did not Google doing the same? My opinion is yes, but much more cool.
Since Google Inc. have employed the same tactic settlement, "in one hand a carrot and a stick in the other." And it works very well and hundreds of thousands of users are google-fans and are happy. Microsoft rose 90 with the stick in one hand and another stick in the other, forgot the carrot, and they have gone. Internet: Microsoft rest in peace.
Happy 10 years Google, which fall due in a few days! We'll envejecéis, and within another 10 years we will see if we learn the lesson that took on your first day of Microsoft.
For some time I notice that God is beginning to take more seriously the TMC (Half Time Connection) and is becoming a very important factor in your company, but an eye, especially in the positioning of blogs. Somewhere when I mentioned earlier the importance of the TMC, especially when talking about reading in digital media and we frankly 6 months by many experiments in-house with this positioning factor.
First I talk about positioning in Google because it is the only way that could apply TMC reliable factor positioning. Google may collect the duration of these sessions in various ways, some would be the introduction of high toolbar, the relatively high number of accounts opened Webmaster Tools in Spanish, and evidently by Google Analytics, wonderful tool that simultaneously makes me understand many things, Google gives more details of my sites that I like.
Increasingly (and is a fascinating topic for a full post) Google interprets and valued differently from blogs and websites, positioning factors are very different weight in the algorithm, and that confuses many Seos and webmasters. According to our experience and our tests TMC is worth much more definitive blogs traditional portals. So in recent weeks have focused on blogs and the analysis we have obtained some very interesting results.
2 items currently in hand, from domains and websites similar to positioning, and they respond to a search, you have a TMC of 2 minutes and 30 seconds of the first content is more interesting, or at least more developed and should first position in the search. That sounds logical, and can be easily verifiable, but it is not the only point on which affects the TMC.
If your blog has a roughly half-time high of connection, you will see a high improvement in global positioning.
Today I would say, according to various experiences we have had, and maybe many people will not be in agreement, to position a blog that is critical to have your root citing incoming links from other blogs post (no templates or blogroll, which also include, but not equal, but especially since the text of the post), and have a high TMC have many comments in a post very specific for these well-to searches.
What is a high TMC?
That is the question. Varies according to topic. Blogs are more or less random in that it is impossible to have a high TMC. Others, however, the reverse. Google thinks that if you post articles or positioned vs similar, that is competing in the theme of your blog (channel) and secondly on your post. In the network of blogs Entertainment Networks blogs have a high TMC (up to 4.30 minutes on average according to Google Analytics) and others who have a much lower TMC is 1.20 minutes of our soil which coincides with a blog that I believe even low quality and that obviously we have to work much more.
To satisfy this curiosity, I will say that TMC has a blog just over 4 minutes and that since a few weeks ago one of the factors on which we value more the quality of bloggers who collaborate with us in our network of blogs is the time that users spend reading your post.
Is this a value that can be improved?
The answer is yes. But if a subject. Currently yes, but in a medium-term future may not be as simple as it is now because the Google algorithm and adjusted to better interpret the TMC.
How can the TMC?
First, the obvious and the most difficult time. Escrever well or at least be interesting and of quality, do not hesitate to extend the information, analyze and explain in more detail all the factors you consider the Internet. It can even be a "brick" Visually, no doubt. But if you're sure that people who write for the interests and values is your opinion / information, and what is going to read without being bored, do not hesitate.
Experiment and analyzed, if you wrote something you believe you need 3 minutes to read, look at the end of the day the stats of that specific article, try to conclude boredom or if people followed him and saw him interesting.
Is critical, regardless of traffic and / or success of your publication, if your TMC is less than 1 minutes, people are coming but the quality is not and do not read. Plantéatelo because they no longer come.
Avoid posting things that lower half of the connections. For example, I like every week I post an image of advertising creativity, (this is for example a few days ago, on Playboy) I like and I will continue doing, but I know that my low TMC this blog since it is a post that can be fun and interesting, but low average consumption of time.
Encourages comments obviously a user adds a comment, especially if you are well trained, is increasing the connection time to your website to be writing about it. That makes the comments a double key factor in any blog.
Use multimedia content. Works with videos to illustrate your post, this is a trick that TMC win in an easy and effective, although I am sure that sooner or later Google will know how to interpret whether the time a user spends on your site is high because you've got a video, or because you are reading.
I have not even 2 months and I continue to blog with some interest-even position is not very good at logical Google. Just mention Google because quite frankly other browsers, at least for me from Spain and virtually non-existent (indeed a pity that there is more diversity).
I saw that my name "Alejandro Suarez" had many results on Google, because they are a mixture of relatively common name and surname (1,500,000 results on Google). Many of them relating to the candidate Izquierda Unida in Asturias (those who know me know that I can be me !), Others called for a photographer in the same way, and many others of a Mexican soap opera actor ... There are many other "Alejandro Suarez" on Google, but those were the main and most times I have found in my searches .
He had some interest, possibly more than curious interest in seeing how long it would take out the first search Google for "Alejandro Suarez. The answer came relatively quickly, since before the first 30 days, on July 20, my personal blog was the first in the search of my name.
Once that doubt, that did not seem a big challenge, but I was very curious at the time timming, I have been thinking about a new goal that requires more complicated and more attention. I think it's fun to propose a challenge to my blog positioning more attractive.
The search for my own name "Alexander" is much more complicated. First by the importance of online and offline "Alexander" that are historically and socially obviously something more important than me:-D. Consulting Google search tocayos as Alexander the Great, and Alejandro Fernandez Alejandro Sanz is an indisputable social relevance and second because the first position in the search for "Alexander" on Google is the first exit of 49,000,000 results, especially something as complicated for a ccTLD www.alejandrosuarez.es and just as difficult for a domain like this without seniority leading online and a half months.
Even then I thought to try, trying to bring some small developments more than a month testing expensive organic positioning on Google. It is a complex challenge, the goal is to get out the first with a personal blog in front of 49 million results and the websites of Wikipedia (Alexander), official website Alejandro Sanz (Spanish singer and musician) and Alejandro Fernandez official website ( Mexican singer). In addition I have a period of 3 months, September, October and November, because the medium term, when the domain length win might be easier. I know it's complicated, but it will be fun to see it.
The idea is to take it as an experiment (which here in the office, our secretary Sara, was named "Alexander the Great Experiment" because it is the first result of Google). I will not spend much time because unfortunately not available and the subject is not too important, nor will I seek help from friends who could push their links, but I think it will still close. The November 1, or perhaps we will see soon.
If you finally leave the first, it will be much, but sonreiré and will be shown that there are things that the best of the algorithms can not even understand. Among them the social, historical and important facts and figures. Alexander the Great, Alexander the par, if I go first would be an insult to the intelligence rational, something that even artificial intelligence can not or will decrypt by itself.
(bets are accepted)
Hace unos días Dios anunció el lanzamiento de su nuevo juguete, Knol (espantoso nombre por cierto), de esta manera Google pretende posicionarse como un competidor de Wikipedia y ya de paso controlar uno de los pocos reductos que aun no ha comprado o controlado en la red.
Lo que diferenciará a esta nueva enciclopedia electrónica de la Wikipedia es que los autores ¿cobrarán? por sus participaciones, ya que recibirán ingresos que se generarán a través de los anuncios de Adsense que aparecerán en las páginas. Esperemos que sea más rentable y real ese pago que cuando Google anunció que compartiría con los autores de vídeos ingresos publicitarios en YouTube, algo que sólo al momento ha sido posible y con cantidades ridículas a grandes partners tipo Antena 3Tv en España.
En su blog de noticias en español, Google explica ahora que su misión es “organizar la información mundial”. No sé si eso es mandato divino, o que son una ONG, yo pensaba simplemente que lo que estaban intentando con Knol es simplemente cortar las alas a la Wikipedia y seguir convirtiéndose en lo que no deberían: un generador de contenidos, es decir, juez y parte (buscador y generador de contenido). Al menos Google ya reconoce abiertamente que su intención es competir con Wikipedia.
¿Quiénes más pagarán esta expansión de Google? Básicamente todos sus pequeños partners de la red de contenido de Adsense a los que sin duda el buscador va a retrasar de posiciones, “arañándoles” unos cientos de euros mensuales preciosos.
No es malo querer ganar dinero. No es malo querer ganar un mercado. Lo que sí es malo e inmoral es hacerlo en nombre de “organizamos la información mundial para ayudaros, insignificantes usuarios que debéis agradecernos esta labor altruista”. Suena a chiste. Yo no necesito que Google me salve ni me solucione la vida, y tampoco creo que lo estén haciendo. Me recuerda a la denuncia de Tele5 a YouTube donde el responsable de YouTube por tener que quitar vídeos que no son suyos del portal decía que se estaba atacando la libertad de la red. (Estos chicos a veces confunden libertad y negocio).
Ahora bien, leí en un error 500 -mágnifico blog, de mis favoritos-, algo que me pareció muy interesante: Knol aparece mejor posicionada que cualquier otra web que no tiene Adsense. Google posiciona a Google. ¿Dónde está la ética?, ¿Qué ha sido de los muchachos de “Dont be Evil”?. Hay empresas que tienen barra libre, se ríen de nosotros y están respaldadas por un lobby tan potente que evita que nadie actué contra ellas. ¿Caerá en su posicionamiento en los próximos meses Wikipedia en detrimento de Knol?
Mientras tanto, uno de los padres de WWW Tim Berners-Lee, pide que se mantenga la ¿neutralidad? de la red . La amenaza, según él, es que los gobiernos nos controlen a través de la web. Acaso, no debemos preguntarnos si el que nos ya nos controla ¿no es Google?. ¿La tan llamada neutralidad de la red no es un monopolio de Google Inc?
Podríamos animarnos a pensar en el gran buscador como un ojo, una “telepantalla”, el Gran Hermano, citando la obra del magnífico Orwell. Ahora todos la tenemos en casa, en el teléfono móvil, en la oficina. En su afán por observarnos y nuclear toda la información, Gran Hermano ha enviado misiones a la selva, a la montaña, etc. El Google Earth Outreach ayuda a asociaciones sin fines de lucro a “contar sus historias” y de paso… a generar más información y mejorar sus Google Maps. El problema no solo pasa por una cuestión de Google. Internet garantiza visibilidad y todos, absolutamente todos, quieren aparecer en la red. Hasta hay un ranking de popularidad en la net. Las asociaciones a las que “ayuda” Google, les conviene mostrarse y estar bien posicionadas. En el mercado de internet ¿todo vale? Mientras tanto, Wikipedia ya incluyó el término Knol dentro de su terminología. Y Knol por ahora, gracias a Dios, sólo aparece en inglés…. Y por mi que siga así por muchos años ¡!
Para mi es obvio que hay un problema, que conoce perfectamente Dios sobre la propiedad intelectual y el copyright en los vídeos de YouTube, pero creo que también es justo reconocer que muchos empresarios del sector, muchos bloggers y muchos internautas nos hemos amparado de que Google está en medio para poder utilizar en nuestras publicaciones vídeos y contenido que, de no estar ellos por medio, posiblemente no nos atreviéramos o no pudiéramos usar, por una razón obvia: no tenemos licencia sobre ellos y que sin la aparición de YouTube se hubieran perdido.
Esta situación, entre Telecinco y YouTube es muy parecida a la “guerra” de ViaCom y YouTube, sólo con un pequeño matiz, esa pelea si va en serio y va a ir hasta el final. En el caso de la televisión española, puedo imaginar que es una pataleta por tener una presencia en YouTube similar a la que tiene Antena3Tv , con canal propio y mejores condiciones. Creo que antes de 12-15 meses veremos un canal de Telecinco, mega-promocionado con YouTube y todo esto se olvidará y serán muy pero muy amigos.
Pero entre medias de todo esto, han ocurrido algunas cosas un tanto surrealistas, que me gustaría destacar:
- El Director de Alianzas de YouTube, Glenn Brown declara a El País que demandas como esta de Telecinco “atentan contra la libertad de expresión”.
Me parece entre divertido y delirante que una persona con la formación y trayectoria de Glenn Brown, pueda decir algo así. Telecinco no atenta contra la libertad de expresión, ¡joder! ellos lo que quieren es que no uséis su contenido sin permiso y no lo moneticéis sin tener un acuerdo con ellos . Vamos que todos lo querríamos si ese contenido fuera nuestro.
Algunas empresas americanas, y entre ellas Google ( Don´t be Evil ) insisten que atacarlas, reclamarlas lo que te pertenece o intentar forzarlas a negociar, TOCARLAS EN BOLSILLO EN DEFINITIVA es atacar la red, la libertad de expresión, etc. Como argumento bastante cutre y superficial en el que se acaban creyendo que ELLOS SON LA RED.
- Más perlas de Brown: “YouTube LLC no ha recibido una notificación de la denuncia. YouTube es una compañía estadounidense. Existe un procedimiento legal en España para poner una demanda a una compañía estadounidense. No tenemos noticia de que los demandantes hayan seguido dicho procedimiento. ”
El DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) es una ley americana de 1998 que pretende resolver parte de los problemas de copyright en la red, obviamente afecta a contenido en USA ya empresas americanas. Me parece intelectualmente cutrillo pensar que todas las compañías del mundo deben cumplir con la ley americana . Si tu, amiguete, estás levantando el contenido de una cadena de televisión española en España corres el riesgo de que te demanden en España o USA, o incluso a nivel internacional en el Tribunal Internacional de la Haya , sin aviso previo como pides y sin cumplir la legislación americana por ejemplo si la demanda se realiza en España, vamos que el DMCA no es una ley internacional, vamos que –aun- tu país, querido Glenn Brown, no legisla el mundo (aunque a veces lo parezca).
- También Telecinco, parece vivir en otro mundo (y eso que es de las pocas cadenas que hace algo medianamente interesante en Internet). Paolo Vasile , su consejero delegado (¿pero quién asesora a este hombre?) ha declarado: “ han llegado piratas nuevos, a los que, además, se celebra y que no son clandestinos. Cotizan en Bolsa y obtienen altos beneficios” .
Sólo 2 comentarios. El primero los beneficios… YouTube no tiene grandes beneficios por explotar los contenidos de Telecinco, eso no es cierto ¡más quisieran!. La realidad es que los chicos de Google aun no saben ni como monetizar correctamente YouTube y si lo saben, no lo están haciendo aun (¡y podría ser por estrategia en temas como este!).
Mi segundo comentario es sobre lo de los piratas. Imagino que la calidad de la programación de su cadena hace que ni el propio Vasile la vea . Personalmente le recordaría que puede que pirata sea el que emita y monetice sus vídeos en internet sin autorización ni licencia, pero que igualmente pirata es la cadena de televisión que coge día tras día para sus zapings y reportajes los vídeos de YouTube sin importarles de quien son, sin pedir autorización, creyendo que la simple mención con una marca de agua es suficiente, y monetizando esos programas y espacios publicitarios.
Conclusión; se acabarán entendiendo bien, son más de lo mismo. Esto es sólo una pataleta, están condenados a entenderse y estas declaraciones y denuncias son parte de una hilarante negociación en la que todos somos atónitos espectadores.
El blog de Alejandro Suarez.