Sánchez-Ocaña Alejandro Suárez. TIME-sector employer since 1998 CEO of the Group Publispain, the network of blogs Entertainment Networks SL and Leisure Blogs, Chairman of Inversora Foley, Director and Founding Partner of Yes.fm, advisor and investor in several companies in innovation, new technologies and internet.
Pedro Jota it plays the fellow
Peter Dear Jack:
I write these lines surprised by your newspaper's editorial, which is also mine, under the title "Zapatero must not give in to the pirates of the Network" published last week.
I was quiet in my office working. He saw the revolt sociological curiosity and the famous "Manifesto", the view each others ... and my stuff was, deep in thought thinking that it seemed an outrage that can close a web page without a warrant. I saw it well, everything from the sidelines, until I felt insulted by the newspaper so brilliantly that you are going and I consume, and I thought you had to bring these letters.
Clearly, Peter, that you do not have written. Your prose is loose and bright, and this editorial in which they portrayed the collective Internet as "pirates" was not only weak but also intellectually devoid of the slightest literary quality. I'm surprised my dear Peter, you order a fellow publishers I imagine will be things of the crisis.
I hope to see it published after the guy you called to orde No, you really sense that criminalize a group of 25 million people is something the less counterproductive, especially ridiculous when you assumed a monthly journal, with data Diffusion in the hand of being the "absolute and undisputed leader" in internet. What position does that leave us, Peter?. Any desgraciao could even insinuate that makes you you, something like Ali Baba, ... in the head of the pirates.

I think many times the example of the recording industry, the only louts who have committed the outrage coming to sue their own customers and users, rather than providing alternatives and adapt to modern times. I fear, dear Peter that because of this fellow, you have been skating in the same way.
I am a romantic and journalism, I was taught in first race that an editorial is the opinion of the media, which is not signed it. They must have changed the times, because I'm sure this is not the opinion of the media, let alone yours, which presume to defend the freedoms and democracy, nor that of many friends who, being Internet users, working in insurance and Unidad Editorial who are neither criminals nor sausages.
Could it be that you have cast the uncle of Advertising, thinking of some fat that could fall campaign?. Perhaps the film industry, from record companies or institutional?. I know that something must have happened, I know Peter, because I have no doubt that you, a champion of freedom and democracy, defending tooth and nail that it was "illegal warrantless kidnap publications. How could you ask for something different for these kids gasoline Internet, that what you want for yourself and your family?. You're a straight guy, not only fighting for what is relevant to you, but for freedom. I know that you, dear Peter, it would have 2 yardsticks in any case.
Then, returning to the mess, is screwed in a bad fellow. Yo, I'm honest, I would charge him. First, because the crisis you can fit on a ERE without making any noise, but I did not load because he has insulted 25 million people, definitely would charge me for writing so badly wrong. This guy does not race.
The blame, as always, lies with the government: education is shit, these fellows are no longer as before ...
Big hug, yours,
Alexander
PS: Peter, beware of the pirates, who I sense that in the medium term might have to obey any orders. In fact it is possible that at least 10 years, the newspaper El Mundo is not only a picturesque and nostalgic subsidiary of online media ElMundo.es and your have to adapt and to obey any of these young hackers, who a day like today, so little assessed.
-> Animate and follow me on Twitter
Tags: fellows, elmundo, mnanifiesto, pedro jota, pirates, politicians, press, Sinde, shoemaker











[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alejandro Suarez FkieCarrero. FkieCarrero said: Very good
RT @ alejandrosuarez: SHIT: Peter Jack was the play the fellow! Http://bit.ly/7GPgnB [...]
Alexander,
You hit the nail, the only explanation is that, the fellow who wants to sink the World.
As you arrive via post correction of Peter J. let him know, surely the same fellow is drafting a request for excuses.
Greetings.
What was that about "do not bite the hand that feeds you"? Some should consult more proverbs, which often fails ... And although he has not written Peter J. (¿?), Which is associated to this editorial is your face, so you must be for him to receive the slaps (virtual, so to speak, then we appear to threaten).
As always, direct and accurate.
Un abrazo!
Social comments and analytics for this post ...
This post was mentioned on Twitter by alejandrosuarez: SHIT: Peter Jack was the play the fellow! Http://bit.ly/7GPgnB ...
I can only take my hat off after reading this, Alexander.
I honestly do not know what so surprised ... the vagaries of the world in every type of issue are historical ... As for the firm, obviously the editorial is the opinion of the newspaper, not the director and I bet that many who think Written by Peter J. have not even passed through his hands ... who knows ... maybe this is the only thing he's written and it reveals how the journalist that it has become.
I think we all are wrong, the computer revolution is of such caliber, that no government has just ver.Desde then traditional measures of prohibition will fail to curb discharges; still have not finished a law and it will be another way to download files
is clear that the model has to change:
http://www.cuatro.com/noticias/videos/pirateamos/20091204ctoultpro_46/
It is not acceptable to him to blame the evils of Internet music, a business that has become too obsolete.
I said that may have been a fellow or may have hired one, so named at a time, black Ana Rosa Quintana, who also got into such a mess.
Note: Bright Alejandro!.
ha ha,
see, Peter J if anything stands out is to defend something and its opposite with a decade apart, defended self-determination, proposed the dirty war against what he now calls constitutional shield and champion against the gal, with Internet and press freedom could not be otherwise.
It's about time to return to say otherwise is saying now (he, not his fellow).
I really liked this post ... especially the end, so congratulations on the article and for taking me with a smile to bed
A greeting
Ahroa to forward this post to: cartas.director @ elmundo.es
I've already ordered!
Good article, Lohe I read almost breathless. Very well written. But anyway, just say that Peter J already know everyone and it was obvious that he thought so and wrote foulbrood or write command to write it under control.
A greeting
very good, Alejandro, jajaja
For however much you deny it just quite simply is that you are a pirate and ill in addition to my people that is called stealing
alejandro, I am surprised. I have read many articles and posts your own highly successful and wise but I think that, like Peter Jack, this time you you could apply the principle of the scholar. This is what happens when the debate turns on, the volume and interjections bury the arguments. I reread the editorial of the world and, frankly, I find nothing more than arguments, but fails to enter into what for me is the essence of the problem are not exactly pure flip obvious and I see they have insulted 25 million Internet. I think we can defend freedom of expression, the right to information, including private copying and indiscriminate discharges for individual consumption since the argument "the information is to be free." Absolutely everything is defensible arguments and studies. Everything but one thing: that there are people who do business with products made by others without paying them and what for me is the real substance, without paying taxes like the rest. I do not understand that the debate has focused on intellectual property rights when we are talking about a blatant illegal activity which is the economy, regardless of the law, protected by the opacity of the network. "Close webs? Conversely, first chase to pay, if they earn money with your business. It is curious that advocates always talk about cerarlas canon and were never spoken of chase to claim his own. To see if you are because they know that they claim is much more profitable "abstract" and negotiate with staff having to go to work in the real world (and virtual) hold their own as we all do every day. Well, I think the editorial in the world was more out there, to criminalize the real pirates, those who profit and do not share or to pay taxes. A greeting.
pepe Jordanian
There's just a word that currently defines the system of property rights, copyright, etc ... and is "business change" who can not see him dead. The difference is not whether or not music is consumed (which is still and will continue), the dieferencia is how music is consumed and this is completely different than it was five years ago. Who does not fit is dead. I give a shit that Loquillo not make music, I do not care, another far more intelligent than him and I will decide whether or not consumption. What to be a pirate or not the last extertor some guys who can not adapt to the environment in which they live and will live.
Regards,
Paul
What if it backwards, so far as work towards a fellow and the latter on "piracy" in the network did? Who has seen him write an article to say that he did or did not he?
I rather think the latter did, the rest will know.
@ pepe Jordanian
Thanks for your feedback Pepe.
You made me read it again ... and I say that not hablña or select, which criminalizes a collective title track from the same ... I see it.
Thanks for your point of view.
Hugs,
A.
pcerezo,
I'm with you that the content industry needs to adapt and that the schemes of the last century are no longer valid when mutated technology and consumer habits. We must find new ways to maximize returns. The musicians have already begun to do so through the direct presentation of logic. The theaters are full. The film will find a way, sure. But I was talking about intellectual property regarding fraudulent business. At the bottom of this page is copyright as a house. What would Alejandro Suarez if I publish a book containing a compilation of their posts and become bestsellers? Does not require financial compensation? I think so. Your thing. But I go further: If instead of selling it as a gift from a website that becomes one of the most visited, and I lined with advertising on the page and not paying him and not to the tax because no one knows who Am I Is not appear that I am at least a rogue?
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
[...] Pedro Jota is the fellow plays by Alejandro Suarez (by Alejandro Suarez) [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays the fellow (by Alejandro Suarez) [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
[...] [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays the fellow (by Alejandro Suarez) [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays the fellow (by Alejandro Suarez) [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
[...] Pedro Jota was the play by Alexander the fellow [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays the fellow (by Alejandro Suarez) [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
In Spain the law is clear .. not a crime until you pepe Jordanian profits .. You can make a book compilation of what you want while nothing happens as gifts.
The same with the example we have set about providing content and lined with advertising.
The difference is between sharing and earning money.
Everyone will be surprised that a representative of movistar come to threaten to sue for having left the phone to a friend.
But logical that we should see if you've gotten to do illegal sale of mobile purchase finished paying for it somehow.
Pedro Jota [...] it plays the fellow (by Alejandro Suarez) [...]
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]
[...] [...]
[...] 10 links recommended by, Entertainment Networks, from 7 December and 12 December. Pedro Jota was the play by Alexander the fellow [...]
[...] Pedro Jota is the fellow plays by Alejandro Suarez How to make a Christmas tree with plastic bottles by [...] Environmentalism
Alexander, without more, subscribe to your words.
Pedro Jota [...] it plays by Alejandro Suarez fellow [...]