Sánchez-Ocaña Alejandro Suárez. TIME-sector employer since 1998 CEO of the Group Publispain, the network of blogs Entertainment Networks SL and Leisure Blogs, Chairman of Inversora Foley, Director and Founding Partner of Yes.fm, advisor and investor in several companies in innovation, new technologies and internet.
Few Indians
Few Indians
I find it extremely curious at times meet with companies that come to me (BTW for any crap that could have been solved with a call or better yet, an exchange of emails) and it appears the CEO, CTO and almost to the CSI and when minimally one scratch in the company they are, nobody else.
Not only do I believe that these structures are surreal type: All heads, not a single Indian, but also always think "fuck, if you are 3 and 3 are here, who the hell is working?".
In matters related to technology, I think, is even desirable that structures can and should be above all three things: horizontal, dynamic, and scalable.
Many examples of poor sustainability in recent times that have made when, for example in the case of online media, advertising low, has drama. The trouble is that sometimes, despite knowing yourself well the theory, self falls on those mistakes, and yes, my me-partner and I happened several times that. Big mistake.
The Indians are necessary in any structure, and on the internet tend to make the whole Christ "head" of something, almost no Indian. Directors of Communication in which they are the only people in the department, as CTOs, CEOs etc themselves. It is a fake that looks great on business cards, but occasionally rubs surrealism.
I bet conceptually lateral structures that the individual freedom and a certain freedom vertical, which reports to a single person and are almost completely horizontal, with only two levels and are far from the classic pyramid scheme, which sometimes, in the case large companies, the information reaches the top, where decisions are capitalized, always when it's late and when the problem is already on the table.
I find it extremely strange and even sometimes overpost meet with companies that come to me (BTW for any bullshit that generally, could have been overcome with a call or better yet, an exchange of emails) and it appears the CEO, the CTO and almost to the CSI and when you scratch a minimal role in the company they are, nobody else.
Not only do I believe that these structures are surreal type: all bosses, not a single Indian, but also always think "fuck, if you are 3 and 3 are here, wasting time with a mindundi like myself, who the hell is working? .
In matters related to technology, I think, is even desirable that structures can and should be above all three things: horizontal, dynamic, and scalable.
Many examples of poor sustainability in recent times that have made when, for example in the case of online media, advertising low, has drama. The trouble is that sometimes, despite knowing yourself well the theory, self falls on those mistakes, and yes, my me-partner and I happened several times that. Big mistake.
The Indians are not only necessary but essential and the most important in any structure, and on the internet tend to make the whole Christ "head" of something, almost no Indian. Directors of Communication in which they are the only people in the department, as CTOs, CEOs etc themselves. It is a fake that looks great on business cards, but occasionally rubs surrealism.
I bet conceptually lateral structures that the individual freedom and if you have talent vertical degree of freedom l, which report to a single person and are almost completely horizontal, with only two levels and are far from the classic pyramid scheme, which sometimes In the case of large firms, the information reaches the top, where decisions are capitalized, always when it's late and when the problem is already on the table.
Tags: CEO, CSI, CTO, company, structures, Indians, Chiefs
7 Comments to "Few Indians
Leave a comment.
 |
 |
Categories
Archives
Entertainment Networks Network Blogs
Contact
Accessed via a QR code
Tags
aceiteoliva alejandro alejandro suarez artespain drink Blogs Carlos Blanco celiac kitchen consoles creativity crisis domains environmentalism Entrepreneurs links women photos Google Guapasyfamosas marketing hours impressive Internet iphonediario links Links of the week gold dell luca Marketing messengermania Autoblog music nutrition Entertainment Networks peliculas Press advertising Social Networks reports SEO seriesblog sexologia phone Jezebel twitter Yes.fm
Translator
 |  |  |  |  |  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interestingly, Alexander. I imagine you receive many requests from small companies looking for, I imagine, investment ... that's good, no?
"Mindundi" jajajaja!
You call Indian workers? Jope ... yes you've fallen under
In the post I agree with you, even some people are once CEO, Managers in another and, when given the need, Counselor at another, and even when it is the case, Founders, Lecturers, Partners and Investors all in one.
Are the side effects of unbridled passion for labels and respect based on the hierarchy ... pity anyone remember the # 50 of Cluetrain Manifesto:
"Today, the org chart is hyperlinked, not hierarchical. Respect practical knowledge is more important than abstract authority.
Ideally, a pyramidal structure logic, but not "physical". Submissions must be fluid and this is achieved with communication networks, not one-way roads.
I personally am a fan of the concept of 'internal customer'. Everyone, even CEOs have to prepare and sell well domestic product (such a good sale or a large merger in the case of the CEO) to an internal client (as some workers who have chosen this project out of better paying jobs and safer, or investors themselves).
So nobody is resting on its laurels, and there is more flexibility to negotiate within the team itself, and know better all processes.
That is another reason why it is difficult to get investors because such practices are losing confidence.
Surely these "companies" are those that "sell smoke" and then break like many already have broken recently.
Greetings!
You're right, Francesc Gómez
I love your article and I do not mean to be a ball. I try never to go anywhere. Most of these meetings are useless and over curras not this morning or afternoon. The trouble is that the Indians are well educated.