Alejandro Suarez Sanchez-Ocana. TIME-sector employer since 1998, CEO of Group Publispain and the network of blogs Entertainment Networks SL, President of Inversora Foley, director and Founding Partner of Yes.fm, adviser and investor in several companies for innovation, new technologies and the Internet.
SGAE has no limits
The voracity of the SGAE has no limits. Just know that they have won a lawsuit about DJ music by remixing songs at parties university.
The Court of First Instance number 8 and Mercantil de Leon issued the ruling last July 7, 2008 in which he fully believes the claims submitted by the General Society of Authors and Publishers (SGAE) against the local Delirium in Leo House.
The festivities took place at a local university frequented by Erasmus. The local stated that only played music of today with Creative Commons license, which requires copyright clearance. But the judge held that under the designation "music now" possibly having to pay duties because according to the SGAE and the judge is "unthinkable" that played alternative music a local duty-free today, but they always end up broadcasts is which appears on radio and television.
The sentencing judge to sentence the defendant to 2289 euros in compensation plus costs of the trial.
This brings me to think that the SGAE ejertito should have the greatest lawyers in the world. How many complaints can not be carried out in parallel at the national level, shameful situations of concern, as they have appeared (and were sentenced for that) in wedding video recording that was aired music and then sue the local and spouses.
The real pirates are not some kids who mingle in a disco music songs. SGAE is doing these antics, instead of searching for and solve the roots (yes, the truth of) the problems. Just a fee to join them for selling all kinds of devices, including mobile between 1 and 3 € should have a bit of embarrassment bullfighter and let ordinary people live in peace.
Tags: complaint, Erasmus, SGAE








I think it is time to reverse roles, for example, which accounts for the video, what is right colaron at the wedding? And the judge said as well, if that DJ currently put music obviously have to put music on the radio and TELO, have not you? then the same argument apply to those colaron at the wedding, the video would be the boots to canapes and drinks without being invited, have not you? That is beginning to pay its voracity!
Sure that with mobile phones, cds and mp3s and mp4s that these guys had the party at their homes and in their pockets, they had already paid enough to SGAE any public dissemination of music that was in their parties. Not for what the judge calls them all, if everything is paid for with the canon.
Les story that happened in my town, my country, in a presentation of dances "folk" a kind of an institution similar to the one mentioned, he wanted to shut down the entire (coming to call the blue of the law) because we did not have the originals, imagine wanting to cut the humble form of culturizar and did not even say that we did money, but good, did not spend a greater good because we are stubborn.
I am not against the eradication of piracy and copyright, but what made the boy?, Hack?, Bag of copies and made money?, Who do not realize that even to make the mixtures gives value added to their music, and spreads without charge (should be entitled to something no), broadcasters are also musical.
And how close the presentation folk? because even people who became assistant union with us, cops and lawyers musical left angry, but left. If this was going to be another ridiculous.